Introduction
Recent reforms such as the Right to Information Act, media activism, and judicial activism have strengthened transparency and accountability in governance. These mechanisms empower citizens and act as checks on misuse of power. However, their excessive or improper use has also created challenges for effective administration.
Body
While RTI and activism have exposed corruption and arbitrariness, misuse through frivolous RTI applications, sensationalist media trials, and excessive judicial intervention has led to administrative paralysis. Officers often fear post-facto scrutiny, allegations, or legal consequences, making them risk-averse and reluctant to take timely decisions. This delays policy implementation and affects public service delivery.
To resolve this dichotomy, a balance between accountability and administrative autonomy is essential. Clear Standard Operating Procedures, protection for bona fide decisions, and time-bound disposal of RTI queries can reduce fear. Media must follow ethical reporting, while courts should practice judicial restraint in policy matters. Capacity building and legal awareness among officers will also boost confidence.
Conclusion
Transparency tools should act as facilitators, not deterrents, to governance. By ensuring responsible use and institutional safeguards, it is possible to promote clean administration while enabling officers to take decisive and innovative actions in public interest.